competition in focus monthly magazine
competition in focus monthly magazine
competition in focus monthly magazine published this article page no275
Admittedly
respondent No. 2 had no cause of action to sue the petitioners as he was not
available in the house at the relevant timc. Therefore the present complaint is
an act of revenge on the part of defaulters to get the present complaint filed
through his son by concocting a false version in the complaint which has never
seen the light of the day. Therefore the present complaint is an act of an
abuse of the process of the Court which cannot be allowed to proceed. competition in focus monthly magazine

Comments
Post a Comment